Depth-4 Lower Bounds, Determinantal Complexity: A Unified Approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
Tavenas has recently proved that any nO(1)-variate and degree n polynomial in VP can be computed by a depth-4 ΣΠ[O( p n)]ΣΠ[ p n] circuit of size 2O( p n log n) [Tav13]. So to prove VP 6= VNP, it is sufficient to show that an explicit polynomial ∈ VNP of degree n requires 2ω( p n log n) size depth-4 circuits. Soon after Tavenas’s result, for two different explicit polynomials, depth-4 circuit size lower bounds of 2Ω( p n log n) have been proved ( [KSS13] and [FLMS13]). In particular, using combinatorial design Kayal et al. [KSS13] construct an explicit polynomial in VNP that requires depth-4 circuits of size 2Ω( p n log n) and Fournier et al. show that the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial (which is in VP) also requires 2Ω( p n log n) size depth-4 circuits. In this paper, we identify a simple combinatorial property such that any polynomial f that satisfies this property would achieve similar depth-4 circuit size lower bound. In particular, it does not matter whether f is in VP or in VNP. As a result, we get a simple unified lower bound analysis for the above mentioned polynomials. Another goal of this paper is to compare our current knowledge of the depth-4 circuit size lower bounds and the determinantal complexity lower bounds. Currently the best known determinantal complexity lower bound is Ω(n2) for Permanent of n × n matrix (which is a n2-variate and degree n polynomial) [CCL08]. We prove that the determinantal complexity of the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial is Ω(d n)where d is the number of matrices and n is the dimension of the matrices. So for d = n, we get that the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial achieves the current best known lower bounds in both fronts: depth-4 circuit size and determinantal complexity. Our result also settles the determinantal complexity of the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial to Θ(d n). To the best of our knowledge, a Θ(n) bound for the determinantal complexity for the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial was known only for a constant d > 1 [Jan11].
منابع مشابه
Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for General Homogeneous Depth 4 Arithmetic Circuits
In this paper, we prove superpolynomial lower bounds for the class of homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuits. We give an explicit polynomial in VNP of degree n in n variables such that any homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuit computing it must have size n . Our results extend the works of Nisan-Wigderson [NW95] (which showed superpolynomial lower bounds for homogeneous depth 3 circuits), Gup...
متن کاملMultiparty Communication Complexity and Threshold Circuit Size of sfAC0
We prove an nΩ(1)/4k lower bound on the randomized k-party communication complexity of depth 4 AC0 functions in the number-on-forehead (NOF) model for up to Θ(log n) players. These are the first nontrivial lower bounds for general NOF multiparty communication complexity for any AC0 function for ω(log logn) players. For nonconstant k the bounds are larger than all previous lower bounds for any A...
متن کاملFunctional Lower Bounds for Arithmetic Circuits and Connections to Boolean Circuit Complexity
We say that a circuit C over a field F functionally computes an n-variate polynomial P ∈ F[x1, x2, . . . , xn] if for every x ∈ {0, 1}n we have that C(x) = P(x). This is in contrast to syntactically computing P, when C ≡ P as formal polynomials. In this paper, we study the question of proving lower bounds for homogeneous depth-3 and depth-4 arithmetic circuits for functional computation. We pro...
متن کاملMultiparty Communication Complexity and Threshold Circuit Size of Ac
We prove an nΩ(1)/4k lower bound on the randomized k-party communicationcomplexity of depth 4 AC0 functions in the number-on-forehead (NOF) model for up to Θ(logn)players. These are the first non-trivial lower bounds for general NOF multiparty communicationcomplexity for any AC0 function for ω(log logn) players. For non-constant k the bounds are largerthan all previous lower bou...
متن کاملUnifying and generalizing known lower bounds via geometric complexity theory
We show that most arithmetic circuit lower bounds and relations between lower bounds naturally fit into the representation-theoretic framework suggested by geometric complexity theory (GCT), including: the partial derivatives technique (Nisan–Wigderson), the results of Razborov and Smolensky on AC[p], multilinear formula and circuit size lower bounds (Raz et al.), the degree bound (Strassen, Ba...
متن کامل